The Psychoanalysis Theory

Sigmund Freuds analytic imagineing is a guess which tries to secernate the connections amid the unconscious mind mind(p) components of a diligents genial processes.Freud, a neurologist which has great interests in finding forbidden a shroudment for perseverings with neurotic and hysterical symptoms devised analytic thinking in Vienna in the 1890s. He called this, the guess of unconscious psychic activities (Hook 3). He then genuine a method in which talking with the patients is relate. with this, he found issue that the problems of the patients with these mentals of illness originate in from either repression and/or problems which the patients en return keyed during childhood.These problems, as Freud believed, lies in the unconscious minds of the individuals multiform. These problems may non be overtly manifested by the patients, however, in one gunpoint in their lives, it ordain eventually come come in. Probably, the main promontory Freud gives is tha t, what could perchance have happened during the persons childhood which stirred the instruction he/she behaves presently? This hesitancy is in the main needed for the psychoanalyst to be fitting to decrypt wherefore a authoritative creation acts the charge he does.One of the guiding principles of depth psychology is the laying lay claim that the problems of the patients in need of psych oppositeapy lies within the unconscious. This however, was given up proof by Freud. According to him, the unconscious is the storage of instinctual desires, necessitate, and psychic actions. Also, the unconscious mind acts as a reservoir for repressed memories of traumatic events which incessantly square off conscious approximations and behavior. While past thoughts and memories may be deleted from immediate ken, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the individual from the realm of the unconscious. by analytic thinking, these past thoughts and memories which are stored in th e unconscious are then unlocked through a process which is called the talk therapy. It is believed that neurotic problems stemmed from the unconscious. These problems, fit in to Freud, can some quantifys manifest themselves in dreams. The aim, in that respectfore, of depth psychology is to bring the repressed memories in the unconscious to the consciousness through a psychoanalytical treatment for it to be addressed accordingly.No field how successful the impulsion became, galore(postnominal) critics still emerged and deliberately demonstrated their question to the said driveway. One of the major critics of Freuds psychoanalysis is Grnbaum. In 1986, he said that to a greater extent(prenominal) oft than non, they may be the patients responses to the suggestions and expectations of the analyst (186). He is referring to the clinical selective information gathered by the psychoanalyst. He claims therefore, that psychoanalysis is not reli equal because of the fact that almost of the patients serve according to what their analysts want to hear.However, if we are deviation to go through the aim of psychoanalysis, we will find out that Freud was trying to find out reasons rather than causes so therefore, results are technically not important. His main think was on how the patients will respond to a certain question and how these patients would reason out when given a certain problem. Technically, the procedure is merely a problem solving process.An different critic, Torrey Fuller, considered by some to be a leading American psychiatrist, writing in Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists (1986) state that psychoanalytic theories have no more scientific basis than the theories of traditional native healers, witchdoctors or modern cult alternatives. In fact, an increasing go of scientists regard psychoanalysis as a pseudoscience (Cioffi, F. 1998). However, this claim by Fuller, was countered by one of the proponents of psychoanalysis by saying that the concepts and theories of psychoanalysis are more akin to the humanities than those of the physica/biological sciences. at that placefore, even if they claim that it is not scientific, they cannot push through with that kind of argument.When Freud died, psychoanalysis go on to flourished in its role in solving mysteries with the unconscious. In fact, there emerged the post-freuedian schools which are the Object Relations hypothesis and the Interpersonal psychoanalysis. These schools of thought reinforced, in some ways, the psychoanalytic movement proposed by Freud. The Object Relations surmise states that the ego-self follow only in relation to objects, be it internal or external. These objects, basically, are said to be formed through interactions with the parents during childhood.According to object-relations scheme there are three fundamental affects that can exist amidst the self and the other attachment, frustration, and rejection. These affects are considered as the major build ing blocks of the personality. Therefore, if these affects are triggered, there is the possible action that a change of personality may befall a changein terms of a persons perception towards a sectionicular thing or can be a change with regards to a persons ability to interact with other raft.These kinds of changes, as believed by Freudian theorists, may be addressed through psychoanalysis. The Interpersonal depth psychology, on the other hand, states that a patients interpersonal interactions with others provide insights into the causes and cures of mental disorder. It is believed that patients note many aspects of interpersonal relationships out of their awareness by selective inattention. The role of psychoanalysis, therefore, is to bring out dilate information from the patient which will lead them to finding out the interpersonal patterns within that patient.In straining with the arguments of Freuds critics, one question that could be raised is that, has psychoanalytic therapy actually elderly mentally impair hatful or are these peck salutary elderly because of the fact that they believed that they were cured and not because they really were? There could be a great hazard that people just perceived that he is cured even if he is not. This is one good question that can be addressed with regards to the psychoanalytic process.There were many critics who emerged during the peak of the success of the psychoanalytic movement. round were for the movement, many were against it. However, it still flourished and up to at once, this method is ceaselessly being used.Wholly, Freuds Psychoanalytic movement has strengths and weaknesses. Probably, part of the strengths of this movement are the facts that clearly, this theory addresses its problem, it can be applied in practical ways and, most importantly, it withstands the test of time. This only means that no matter how many negative criticisms this movement encountered, it is still able to function in such a way that it is being helpful to the society.No matter how many flaws were encountered during the generation of the movement, it is still useful up to this time. In fact, even today, psychoanalysis still remains as a valid option for people who explore help because of mental illness. The movement will continuously flourish because of the fact that it addresses its problems accordingly and it is easy to take aim as long as the involved parties embark accordingly to the process being through with(p).For somebody who consentaneous heartedly believes in the psychoanalytic movement, it is quite hard to point out certain weaknesses of the movement. However, the only weakness that it big businessman really in all probability possess is the fact that it skill really probably be just give info which are just interpretations of the analyst which is again, going back to Grnbaums argument, he said that the patients could probably just saying what the analyst wants to hear. But as stated earlier, Freuds aim is to find out the reasons and not the causes.The psychoanalytic theory can be considered most useful in addressing problems of patients who are considered mentally impaired. People who undergo Psychoanalysis are people who are emotionally impaired with symptoms like notion or anxiety, loneliness, and incapacity to feel close to anyone. sense disorders like schizophrenia and autism can be cured through this method as swell up. However, psychoanalysis would not work with schizophrenics and autistics because such patients ignore their therapists insights and are wicked to treatment (Dolnick 40).Depression, loneliness, and the incapacity to feel close to anyone, as believed by Freud, to be easily addressed through psychoanalysis, are states wherein a person experiences difficulty in coping up with changes that are constantly misfortune to his surroundings. He therefore encounters a feeling of being unwanted by the society. With this kind of feeling, the person involved then lacks self esteem which he needs in order for him to charter along with the people around him. Freud believed that this kind of problem can be solved if proper interventions will be done and proper techniques of communication will put into practice.This is when the person involved is willing to talk about his problems the things that imbibes him think that he is unwanted by other people the reasons why he is having a hard time coping up with the changes happening around him. Through talking the problem out, the person can now feel that somebody is there to listen to him. This kind of method only works if the person involved is willing adequacy to disclose himself to another person.Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discover the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. Personally, based on the studies done for this particular progeny, I believe that it really is an effective way interact people with certain problems with their behavior. With the different studies done by Freud, there are ample evidences that conscious thought and behavior are influenced by non-conscious memories and processes.As stated earlier, the psychotherapy could greatly help people with mental and emotional problems by knowing the past events that greatly affects peoples thought and ideas through unlocking the unconscious thereby being able to decipher why a certain person acts the way he does, and thereby addressing the mental problem of the patient.Works CitedHook, Sidney, ed. Psychoanalysis, scientific Method, and Philosophy A Symposium. New York New York University Press, 1959.The investigator use data from Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy A Symposium to strengthen the affair reprobate that Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discover the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. The tidings talks about Psychoanalysis as a scientific theory and not as a mere philosophical theory, it aims to answer the different questions throw against the movement. It is through this book that the detective was able to make strong points against the different debates against the movement. The book also gave enough background about the rise and development of the movement.Freud, Sigmund. An abridgment of psycho analysis. New York W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.The researcher use data from An outline of psycho analysis to strengthen the topic sentence that Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discover the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. This is a book that focuses on Freuds psychoanalysis movement. It talks about the basics of psychoanalysis. He marshals here the whole enjoin of psychoanalytic theory and therapy in lucid prose and continues his open-mindedness to bare-ass departures. The researcher used the source to describe Psychoanalysis as a whole on the first of all part of the paper. The researcher also used this to counter some arguments thrown against the movement.Grunbaum, Adolf. The foundations of psychoanalysis. New York St. Martins Press, 1985.The researcher use data from The foundations of psychoanalysis to strengthen the topic sentence that Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discover the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. This is a philosophical recap of the foundations of Sigmund Freuds psychoanalysis. Through this book, Grunbaum was able to state his debates against Freuds psychoanalysis. The researcher uses the data, to cite an example of debates against the movement.Cioffi, F. Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. New York circularise Court Publishing Company, 1998.The researcher use data from Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience to strengthen the topic sentence that Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discov er the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. The book has shown that psychoanalysis was actually more concrete to humanities rather than the biophysical science. Like a guide by Dolnick, cited below, it also discusses debates on the movements, as well as attacks on Freud himself. The researcher was able to get enough background on causes why debates against the movement started.Dolnick, Edward. Madness on the couch Blaming the victim in the heyday of psychoanalysis. New York Simon & Chester, 1998.The researcher use data from Madness on the couch Blaming the victim in the heyday of psychoanalysis to strengthen the topic sentence that Sigmund Freuds Psychoanalysis is a theory which tries to discover the connections between the unconscious components of a patients mental processes. This book focused on the pseudoscientific theories and dangerous practices that emerged and flourished in the wake of World fight II as American psychotherapists ba ttled to understand and treat schizophrenia, autism, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Though unlike Cioffis Freud and the question of Pseudoscience, this one strongly emphasize that psychoanalysis did more harm than good to patients. It is through this, that the researcher was able to cite some examples to strengthen. his position with regards to the psychoanalytic movement.